It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
You will learn that the ruling made by the High Court was stuck to. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.
Recommended reference: look these up
